Skip to main content

Posts

Humans prefer man-made lakes to man-made streams: a case study on Doan Brook

  Wade Lagoon at the Cleveland Museum of Art is an iconic and beloved landmark in Cleveland's University Circle neighborhood. It also happens to be a man-made body of water along Doan Brook, downstream of the Shaker Lakes. (The lagoon used to be connected to the brook but no longer is; part of a nearly mile-long underground culverted section of brook runs past the lagoon.) That humans, generally speaking, are more drawn to lakes than to brooks seems like an obvious fact of human nature, and one that's important to consider when deciding on plans for the future of the Shaker Lakes. I've been frustrated, then, by how some people continue to be in denial about this fact. (Example: in response to statements about the health benefits of access to blue space, or of how proximity to water features makes homes more desirable, I've seen lake removal advocates state that there will still be water where the lakes were, as if this is some amazingly clever point.) Unfortunately, the...
Recent posts

When 1,000 trees aren't equal to 1,000 trees: the Sewer District's fuzzy math

In 2019, Cuyahoga County issued an update to a 2013 Urban Tree Canopy Assessment. The update found that, "despite concerted efforts in many local communities to increase tree canopy," over the years 2011-2017 the county's tree canopy had suffered further decline from 37.0% to 34.7% of total land area. A  supplement  to the update, prepared by a forester with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, included this interesting statement: "A healthy 50-year-old sugar maple will sequester 120 times the annual amount of carbon of a 10-year-old tree. Tree crowns start to have an impact on cooling as they begin to fill out, between 15 and 20 years of age. Therefore, planting trees will not change canopy cover benefits for two to three decades. Consequently, a tree planted in 2020 will have little or no impact on the canopy until 2040 or 2050." Remember that as you read the rest of this post. The revelation that the Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District (NEORSD) "...

So, about those thousand (mostly native and healthy) trees at Horseshoe Lake...

I actually thought after my previous entry that I'd be taking a break from writing these posts for at least a little while, but the Sewer District pulled me right back in when I learned of their outrageous most recent project update. Easily one of the most controversial aspects of the Horseshoe Lake project is the fact, which became public knowledge late last year despite having been in the works for several years, that the plans call for removing over one thousand trees. Most people are shocked when they learn this. I've gotten pushback, though, from people who say that most of the thousand trees are invasive or unhealthy. They thought this because the Sewer District led them to believe it. I'd looked into it and come across a statement I previously hadn't known about in which the Sewer District said "most or about half" of the trees are invasive. Still a very large number of native trees! Imagine my surprise when I learned that, on February 20 of this year, ...

Proposition: permanently decreasing the desirability of our city as a place to live is a bad idea, actually

 "The lovely landscape and lakes mattered not just to nearby residents but also to those in surrounding neighborhoods. As a Realtor I was awed by the geographic spread of those who valued and used the area. It made the area a 'destination.' Don't lose those irreplaceable assets." -Mary, someone who signed and commented on the  petition to save the Shaker Lakes. Of the many reasons I think the Shaker Lakes are worth preserving, the one that stands out above the rest, and that in some ways encapsulates all the other arguments, is this: the lakes undeniably make the area around them a nicer and more desirable place to live. Losing them would make the area a less nice and less desirable place to live. We should be very reluctant to do something that would make our community a less desirable place to live, and should thoroughly explore all reasonable alternatives before doing it. It was recently suggested to me that I look for data to support this argument, so I did, a...

A response from the Sewer District: "I don't think it's possible to restore the natural state"

In the 1960s, residents of Shaker Heights and Cleveland Heights famously stood up to fight against and ultimately stop a plan that would have destroyed the Shaker Lakes and surrounding parklands. Today, the leadership and some other prominent voices in the same communities are content to go along with, or in some cases enthusiastic proponents of, plans to remove one or even both of our historic lakes. How did this happen? It's an interesting question, and I think it has an interesting answer. If you look at official descriptions of the lake removal plan and at things that members of the public who support the plan have said, a prominent theme consistently emerges. From the Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District (NEORSD) page describing the project , in an update on July 26, 2022: "In other words, this will help the team restore Doan Brook to its original, natural state  [emphasis mine]." In an update on August 25, 2022: "As the Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District ...

Destroying nature in the name of "restoring" nature: a deep dive into the NEORSD Horseshoe Park project

Alternate title: Save Doan Brook from the "Doan Brook Restoration" 3/2/26 edit: After reading this post, be sure to see the followup from after I talked to some people from the Sewer District, which answered some of my questions but raised others: shakerlakes.blogspot.com/2026/02/a-response-from-sewer-district-i-dont.html In December 2022, I attended a public open house at the Shaker Heights library about the Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District's plan for a new park at the site of Horseshoe Lake. I was very disappointed about the news that the beautiful, historic lake would be going away, but I was also relieved by the since broken promise that the Sewer District would preserve Lower Shaker Lake, the other historic lake in the Shaker Parklands. I had also heard a lot about how "brook restoration" was "more natural," and I didn't know at the time that this was misleading, so I thought maybe it made sense to return one of the two Shaker Lakes to a...